Realistic Expectations and Male Quality

This is the first re-draft of a chapter from my upcoming book, as voted for by you. You can find the details here and the original posts here and here. I hope you enjoy this post and I’d be interested to hear your thoughts in the comment section.

*****

I’m going to be harsh in this chapter and give you some realistic expectations for what someone can achieve in Daygame in terms of quantity and quality. It makes for some daunting reading.

This whole chapter is dependent on your starting SMV. If you start with a higher SMV then you can get higher quality to begin with, and over time. Remember that the sexual marketplace (SMP) aims to match up high value men with high value women. We all have something to offer (our value) and we try to find others who we can trade it with. Men typically have value in areas such as resource generation and protection, whereas women typically have value in their beauty and nurturing ability. As a mammalian species we have two genders which complement each other and the SMP works to create partnerships of complementary ability. SMV is the currency of the SMP, and so anytime sex occurs there must have been something that each party valued in the other, even if there, on the surface, appears to be a mismatch: maybe the guy is “just her type” or vice versa. In that case there is something specific about that person that the other person values.

Remember that you can’t cheat the SMV. If you’re a male six – all told i.e. including your looks, status and behaviours – then you cannot bang a female seven. We will get back to this later, but it’s an important message to hold in your head as you go along: the SMP matches up high SMV men all told with high SMV women all told. The only way to get a girl above your long term SMV is to take advantage of the daily swings in your vibe.

Just as an obvious disclaimer: people don’t walk around with a social score-esque rating above their head which indicates their SMV. However, humans are great at measuring things relative to other things – for example, humans can tell if a room is hotter or colder than another but not their exact temperatures – and so people are good at assessing whether someone is roughly below, in the same, or above their league, SMV wise.

Potential SMV is also a big thing. Work on your looks and your behaviours and nurture your vibe in the medium to long term and maybe an average guy can improve himself from a five to a six all told. Sounds like a small difference – one which will take a monumental amount of effort once he gets beyond the initial burst of cleaning up his life – but it makes laying sixes much easier, saving many hours of work, and you might just luck your way to a few sevens as well on those days of terrific vibe. It also puts the eights within reach given the guy has the perfect combination of luck, persistence, tenacity, determination, etc, on the day in question. Your potential SMV is going to govern your ceiling in Daygame.

Potential SMV is also capped, by the way; no amount of telling yourself “I’m a ten” will actually make you a ten. Now, we all go through a “fake it til you make it” phase in the beginning where we’re trying to big ourselves up to have a higher SMV than we really have but that illusion wears off. Once it does you’re going to need to rely on real value. Essentially: don’t disregard the “making it.” As I alluded to before you have to actually give her a reason to have sex with you. SMV is king.

So what are some realistic expectations:

If you start out as an absolutely average guy but show dedication, consistency, persistence, smarts, curiousity and can handle rejection and possess a huge list of the qualities that makes someone good at Daygame, and get near your potential SMV, plus there’s nothing else going on in your life which will affect your ability to approach (e.g. too much work, death in the family, etc.) then you can expect to get around 12 lays a year. 11 one year, 13 the next, etc; it averages out.

I’m basing that number on all the conversations I’ve had with Daygamers over the past years plus my experience coaching. It is extremely rare for me to meet someone who’s actually getting 12 (or, even rarer, more) lays a year.

What stands out to me is how low that number may seem. You have to have all your ducks in a row, work very hard and yet you’re only going to get 12 lays in a year? Famously, “an intermediate Daygamer should expect to get 12 lays a year” but from talking to so many Daygamers and finding out what their lay counts really are, 12 is more like a figure which will put you in a very high percentile.

The issue at play here is survivorship bias (in fact, on further thought this is the main driver behind the first part of this chapter). For some to be Daygaming beyond their first summer puts them, already, into a statistically improbable camp. When I first wrote this post a common objection I got was “yeah but I know person XYZ and they got 12 lays a year easy.” Firstly, that’s an anecdote, and secondly, you’re forgetting the hundreds of guys that failed at the very first hurdle: approach anxiety. Daygamers, as they progress, tend to congregate with other experienced Daygamers and so forget the hundreds of beginners who dropped out.

Not only is it very rare for a Daygamer to get to 12 lays, the lays are distributed exponentially. That means that most of the guys getting laid from Daygame are still only getting a few lays each year. Here’s the (stylised) distribution:

  • 0-3 lays per year: 90% of Daygamers
  • 4-6 lays per year: 5% of Daygamers
  • 7-9 lays per year: 3% of Daygamers
  • 10-12 lays per year: 1% of Daygamers
  • 12+ lays per year: 0.1% of Daygamers

(who knows where the remaining 0.9% went. I don’t. Do you?)

It’s also a point to note that that distribution includes those skilled Daygamers who live in smaller cities, who’s upper ceiling of lays per year is constricted by population. Another point to consider are the guys who are seeing girls more than once and trying to keep girls on rotation; naturally their drive to chase new lays will be curtailed. Overall, I repeat, it is extremely rare to find a Daygamer with 12 or more lays in a year.

MALE QUALITY

Male SMV is made up of your looks, status and behaviours. Some examples are:

  • Looks: height, bodyfat %, facial structure, muscularity (to a point), style
  • Status: visible wealth, social circle, ecosystem
  • Behaviours: Game, likeability, leadership, vibe

Broadly speaking your looks provide the most r-selected value and your status provides the most k-selected value. There is some crossover to note such as a tan indicating that you have the means and time to holiday in warm locations (looks providing k-selected value: status) and your age (if a man is older he is implied to have higher status, but this will also amplify your dominance and give more r-selected value). Featuring in both r and k-selected value are your behvaiours.

You’ve also got your long term and short term SMV. The big difference being that your vibe fluctuates from day to day and can increase the latter. So you might be a six in all areas of your life, but on a particularly great day of vibe, that six might get boosted to a seven purely from your positive mindset. Alternatively you might get out of the wrong side of the bed that morning and hit the streets as a five. Practising good vibe management will allow you to tilt those short term fluctuations positively. If you could – somehow – plot your total SMV over time then that would be your long term SMV. Strategic Game – where you change your looks, status, behaviours, location, etc. over time – allows you to increase your long term SMV.

I like what Krauser said in Adventure Sex in that girls don’t really think in ratings like guys do. They think in terms of categories:

  • Invisible
  • Dateable
  • Hot (hawt!)

This is how I’d interpret those categories if we mapped them to a number. Note that I’m talking about r-selected sex and so these numbered ratings represent your r-selected value (looks plus crossover status plus behaviours):

  • Invisible: five and below; it doesn’t make sense for a girl who is at least a five to go anywhere near a guy who’s also a five when she can get fast sex from a six or better
  • Dateable: six to seven
  • Hot: eight

So at a higher level what this means is Daygame is all about male sixes, sevens and eights going after female sixes, sevens and eights (and in all honesty, the male sixes are banging some female fives as well). And let’s be straight here: just as it’s extremely rare to find a guy getting 12 or more lays a year from Daygame, it’s just as rare amongst those guys to find someone who has laid an honest to God, creme de la creme nine. For nearly everyone reading this, stop talking about the nines because they genuinely are out of your league. Eight is the upper limit. And this isn’t a limiting belief; the SMP matches high value men with high value women. What’s more limiting is your SMV.

Okay, so what kind of quality can a guy expect? Firstly there’s the issue that looks are distributed normally. That means that for every six there isn’t an equal number of sevens, and for every seven there isn’t an equal number of eights. In fact the proportion decreases as we go: there are less sevens than sixes, but there are even less eights than sevens. That is, for every deviation you move away from the mean (a five) the proportion of the next deviation is lower than the previous one. At the end of the day, the vast majority of people look or look close to average. In practice that means that your average quality is likely to be below your own rating because of sheer population effects and hypergamy. Remember that girls don’t sleep with guys who they think are below their league, but guys will sleep with a girl who is below theirs if the lay is easy enough. That means that for sex to occur the girl must perceive the guy’s SMV to at least be equal to hers; the alternative condition need not be true.

A lot of guys will regurgitate the phrase that “Game is two points hotter” but from what I’ve seen this is such an anomaly that it isn’t true in practice. Guys who are average in every area of their life do not just start practising Game and start laying true sevens. It’s not like just putting on a new set of clothes.

Firstly, Game isn’t an on/off switch: in the time it takes for them to learn and become proficient they will/should have improved other areas of their lives, making them better than average. Secondly, most guys don’t actually have the talent to become very good at Game because of all the rejection they will need to face. If a guy consistently practises Game he will almost certainly be able to get better at it – it will contribute to his life – but he’s unlikely to be very good. Lastly, if you do see a guy who is “average in every area of their life” become successful with Game then he is, by backwards induction, showing that he “had it in him all along;” people don’t tend to grow these personality traits if they never had them. That is, he had the prerequisite qualities to succeed such as determination, persistence and resistance, all along. This suggests that Game is the conduit through which a man’s conscientious traits are awakened.

Maybe it would be the case that “Game is two points hotter” if looks were the only thing that mattered, but they don’t: your status and behaviours matter too; a guy with average looks might have a lot of status and have a likeable personality; that would mean that his all told SMV was more than just five out of ten. Bragging about your skill by purely comparing looks to looks is misleading and is based in a feminine worldview: that your own value is mainly looks based. Luckily for us men, we have many strong possible sources of SMV.

In reality: “vibe is one or two points hotter” (and two points is the stretchiest of the absolute stretches that you can imagine; we’re talking some of the best days of your life here). You have your r-selected value and then your vibe is the thing that fluctuates from day to day. That is the x-factor which can get you girls hotter than your long term station.

It should also be said that the proportion of guys, as you move from stage to stage, is even less than for girls because of hypergamy. The incentive for a guy to be one point hotter is more than for a girl, because if a guy is only one iota better than his peers then he’ll take the lion’s share of the spoils. One man can impregnate and protect multiple women and so the rewards to competition are massive. So, in a contrived example, there might be three female sevens to ten female sixes, but only two male sevens to ten male sixes, and so on. This competition leads to longer tails in the distribution of male ability: higher genetic variability means there’s a better chance that one of your sons becomes the tribal chief and takes all the rewards. The flipside is that there are a lot more weird guys then there are weird girls.

REALISTIC EXPECTATIONS GIVEN MALE QUALITY

Now let’s take a hypothetical guy who is a five (completely average looking, average height, average muscle, average job, average life experience, average Game, etc.) and through a few years of hard work on his looks and Game managed to improve himself to a six. Maybe he also travels more often to the places where his particular look/genetic makeup gets him the furthest (though remember the adage “if you can’t get laid at home then you won’t get laid away”). This is the kind of quality that a guy can expect to get.

  • 0 – 1 eights
  • 1 – 2 sevens
  • 3 – 6 sixes
  • 2 – 4 fives

Remember, these figures are for a guy who has worked extremely hard to turn himself from a five (all told) into a six (all told), does not encounter any difficulties in his life which would curtail his Daygaming, and is in that 1% of Daygamers who manages to get about 12 lays in a year, on average. Obviously if he was getting less than 12 then you would need to scale down the numbers accordingly as well as if his SMV was lower/higher than six.

Of course I acknowledge that there’s a subjective element to rating girls, but I’ve Daygamed for long enough now and talked to enough Daygamers to get a good understanding of what counts as a global five, six, seven or eight. I’ve also seen enough guys try Daygame and seen the reactions they get to be able to rank them too. That influences my ratings and distributions above. On the other hand, when a guy is a beginner or lower intermediate they tend to rate their girls more on what their pre-Game expectations were which leads to over-rating. For them an eight is simply any girl more attractive than their last girlfriend before Game. I was guilty of this myself and so ended up lowering a few ratings on my blog’s statistics page once I had more perspective and less ego involved.

Given the distribution of hotness amongst girls and the effect of population, we can now form some expectations for what guys can expect.

Male Six: this guy’s average quality (add up the ratings and divide by the number of lays) is going to be slightly lower than six. Most of his lays will be with fellow sixes but for every seven that he lays there might be two fives (if he’s being totally honest with himself). Male sixes have the most pressure in the community to lie about their quality because of the stigma of claiming a five.

Male Seven: the average quality will be slightly lower than seven. He’ll lay mostly sevens but for every eight he lays there’ll be two or three sixes. Now, that means his average quality is going to be further below his own rating than for the male six. Why is that? It’s sheer weight of population: eights are rarer than sevens but not as rare as sevens are to sixes. The male seven simply has less to aim at compared to the male six.

Male Eight: the average quality will be lower than eight and again the average quality will be further below his own rating. In practice, nines are out of the question (though most possible for the male eight but he’ll need that perfect storm of value, vibe and luck to bang her). The male eight runs the highest risk of “slumming it.”

That might be dreary reading, but remember that it’s down to things you can’t control: population and normally distributed looks and hypergamy. One thing that is vital to remember is: are you happy with your own results? If you are indeed “slumming it” but you don’t care and are having fun then that’s what’s important. If you do care about other people accusing you of that then the only way out is to give yourself a quality floor and stick to it, but that will reduce your number of lays per year at the same time. The decision is up to you.

It also means that we shouldn’t detract from anyone’s achievements. Let’s take the six, for example: he might have worked incredibly hard to get himself there and turned himself from “invisible” to “dateable.” That’s an amazing achievement which most men couldn’t. The same goes for anyone who made the decision to better themselves; we shouldn’t then look down on them for enjoying the fruits of their labour.

WHY EVEN DO DAYGAME?

Many people report that the quality is higher from Daygame, so just imagine what the average guy is getting from Nightgame! Next consider the survivorship bias in those other forms of Game: imagine how many guys go out and try to pick-up girls at “de cloob;” now imagine how many guys are swiping on dating apps right now. The guys who succeed in Nightgame and online are going to be a tiny, tiny percentage of those who ever tried it. Daygame also offers a health benefit: you don’t have to be out late into the night, you don’t have to drink as much, there’s less bullshit with her friends, etc. There’ll probably be a specific reason why you prefer Daygame to other forms of Game but that’s beyond this post.

There’s also the question of “how would you be doing without Game at all?” Rather than lucking into a one night stand with a drunk six every two years you’re now laying three sixes a year from Daygame who you won over based on your charisma, which is 1000 times more fulfilling. Plus there’s the impetus to grow as a person which Daygame provides. Whether that return is enough for you is for you to decide.

So there you go. Work really hard, don’t mess up, be consistent and get your whole life in order and you can expect to get 12 lays a year with girls who are roughly the same SMV as you, all told. Sounds depressing, but this message is actually one of hope: beginners ought to have realistic expectations for what they are getting into; and all Daygamers ought to be able to compare themselves to realistic expectations so that they can know that they’re actually doing very well.

Yours unfaithfully,

Thomas Crown

If you enjoyed this post and want to support the blog then please consider buying one of my books or hiring me for coaching. Follow me on Twitter for daily updates. 

> Buy my memoir (£12)

> Buy my textbook (£20)

> Hire me for coaching: coaching calls and infield coaching available (£25 per hour and £50 per hour respectively)

> Follow me on Twitter

33 thoughts on “Realistic Expectations and Male Quality

    1. lol I hope but doubt that this is the real John Keegan. Tom if you want to listen to his infields that took him “10 years” to produce, send me a message.

      Like

  1. Amazing post. Obviously not daygame, but I’ve known random average (in all aspects) photographers who do lay some of the models they shoot. Interesting dynamic there no doubt. Those models have gone onto date athletes afterwards

    Like

    1. Thanks!
      I’d have to meet them to confirm that. Average guys in all (all) respects don’t lay models I’m afraid (though I know you’re not suggesting this, I don’t think photography based game leads to better than average results compared to DG). And when it comes to value, at the very least, a photographer has some status because he’s leading the shoot.

      Like

  2. You are justifying your own lack of success with a rogue theory…
    The thing girls care most about is money. This has been known since the beginning of time. Girls don’t clearly place men into r/k…they see it as one big blur/spectrum.
    An average looking guy, with an average vibe and average social skills but net worth above 500k can regularly date 9’s with little effort

    Liked by 1 person

  3. ‘Girls don’t like boys, girls like cars and money’
    From Gwen stefani to ABBA the message is clear

    Be average in all possible ways. Have some masculine personality traits. Don’t be socially awkward or a simp. Make good amounts of money (middle class isn’t sexy). You will slay more quality poon than any advanced day gamer.

    Like

  4. Ever wondered why the hottest girls are found in chelsea, tribeca, Monaco, st tropez, miami…(ie where rich men party…)
    Ever wondered why girls obsess over designer bags and shoes?
    Ever wondered why hot girls spend hours queuing outside upscale clubs and restaurants just to get an ig shot?
    Ever wondered why upscale mayfair clubs are filled with 90% hot girls and ghetto clubs are filled with ugly girls?

    Ever wondered why men risk their lives in crime? Or why men care about more about investing, crypto etc

    Because, once you meet her minimum looks threshold and social awkwardness threshold, money is the primary thing which determines a man’s smv.

    Fellas, don’t end up like these puas in their 40s who realise they pissed their life away with ‘game’. Don’t try to reinvent the wheel. Focus on making copious amounts of money

    Like

  5. A few concluding points

    -If you think rich men need ‘vibe’ or ‘state’ you have no idea how sexual economics work

    -there are indeed a few genetics outliers..men who are literally so exceptionally good looking, and tall, with expectational social skills that they don’t need money…but this is less than 2% of men…so it’s not worth focusing on them…there’s always outliers … these guys will also struggle to compete against rich men.

    -daygame subcommunicates ‘I don’t have money or a job, so I’m trawling the street looking for a mating opportunity’. Rich men simply park somewhere in their sports car or walk around an exclusive hotel and get enough IOI’s that the approach seems ‘natural’

    -some men with money still struggle. This is because either a) they THINK they have money but they don’t. Ie 100k is not going to get you laid. Wtf can 100k get you – a tiny flat in Scotland. 500k+ is the benchmark. Most women are instantly smelling you out to see if you’re a high earner. B) they don’t know how to communicate their wealth indirectly – they brag overtly or lead with it (so it feels like an overcompensation or lie). Most hot girls have access to millionaires so you shouldn’t brag or lead with your wealth – it’s more so just a basic requirement to her (albeit a rare oneg. You should seduce her by tastefully bragging about your lifestyle and flexing your lifestyle instead. Remember women are wired to make babies – lifestyle is what counts, not the figure in your account. Cars, watches, holidays, career accomplishments etc

    – a good theory is simple to understand. Ever notice how ‘game’ is more complex than Einstein’s E=MC2? That’s because it’s fabrication. the truth is simple and everyone knows it instinctively. Women want men who have lots of money and have masculine/leader personality traits

    -some rich men are so socially awkward that they cannot get laid. The issue isn’t being ‘r’ selected. The issue is being socially awkward.

    -if you aren’t rich (ie are an objective 5) the best chance you have to pull hotties is by showcasing your ambition and high status network so you at least ‘seem’ like one day you could become rich. If she can envision you as ‘making it one day’, you could have a shot with a girl 4 points higher

    Isnt it funny how all PUA theory misses out on the one obvious thing that actually works and has worked over millennia? It’s because they want to part you from…your money 😉

    Like

    1. I thought that with such a long comment it would mean that at least you had some gamma intelligence. But no, this is all just idiocy. I’m guessing you tried pickup and failed and now you’re getting triggered by the truth.

      Like

      1. Nah bro. I used to daygame in my younger years and the success was incomparible to what I have now. I currently have a rotation of 4 attractive women (8’s), all of which Ive met in the last 5 weeks. I can easily get more attractive women on a night out, or online or just approaching during day after I get IOI’s. I have more options that I’ve ever had. The only thing is that has changed is I’ve come into professional success and can see that it’s easily the main thing which matters and makes a difference with attractive women. A basic understanding of flirting over text is the only ‘game’ needed. I’d say 20% of approaches lead to success, and I only go for 8’s and 9’s. Before, I would be physically attractive enough and have enough social skills to approach girls and get numbers but ‘something was always off’ – ie my results were similar to what you’ve written about in the post. Once I started flaunting my wealth, everything changed and women would be the ones aggressively chasing me and investing once I had made the initial approach. Of course most PUA’s will never be able to verify this, because most of them aren’t rich.

        Like

  6. The way women think is very simple…
    ‘Middle class isn’t sexy’. A normal life is boring. Etc
    You can see this from how they approach Instagram (flaunting an imaginary fairytale lifestyle they can’t afford but hope to attract)…
    Being perceived as a big baller, everything flips in your interactions. The ‘unobtainable’ girls start throwing sex at you. My guess is it comes down to evolutionary roles – it’s all about making babies with men that can provide the best lifestyle (and genes) for the kids. Being able to provide a good lifestyle also shows high genetic quality. Being good looking and tell but only providing a mediocre lifestyle indicates you may have some genetic weaknesses which hinder your ability to compete for resources (eg physiological weakness, lack of cunning/intelligence, low energy etc) .
    I’ve been able to get with girls that I wouldn’t have imagined (including a girl who is now dating a famous Chelsea footballer) just by owning a nice sports car and rolex and having good social skills….I don’t have anywhere near as much money as the footballer…nowhere near…but I have enough to seduce most women.
    Attractive Girls (ie 8s and 9s…the ones that are most competed for) have a minimum looks threshold (usually 6/10 above in her eyes)
    Minimum height threshold (taller than her)
    Minimum income threshold (if they are 8s/9s, I’d say this is net worth 500k-1Million to give you a 20-30% success rate)

    Like

  7. There’s a reason why rappers do nothing but boast about their finances, wear jewellery etc
    Or women become ‘ screaming groupies’ for successful singers and throw their panties on stage at them..
    There are men banging way more than 12 girls/year without investing 10% of the effort as daygamers my friend…
    PUA’s are rarely succesful playboys…I personally know a man that has banged 8 hot girls in January alone. He is 6’5 and earns 200k/year.
    Any successful playboy (eg trump in his younger years) will tell u that women see money as a man’s SMV measuring stick…

    Like

  8. To see the real Sexual Market Place in action…hang with the social winners … instead of hanging around daygamers on Oxford street, hang with the guy that owns the Joe&Juice or the Starbucks they sit at. Provided he’s in his 30s; still single; and decent enough looking, you’ll see how much pussy he gets thrown at him…at the store, at his £150/month health club, at the upscale venues he visits with other succesful men etc the girl you approach at Starbucks wants to meet HIM, not a daygamer!

    Like

  9. Final point…
    When you’re in your early 20s it doesn’t matter as much. Genetic quality just comes down to looks and social skills. There is little expectation for wealth (although even then, the rich preppy guys and sport athletes with high earning potential will still get the most girls)

    But in your 30s she’s going to wonder why you have less money than everyone else or why you’re not a clear financial winner and assume you have subpar genetics. Especially if you met via daygame, she will wonder if you just chase ass all day.

    It gets more cut throat the older you get, (eg at 35 it’s unforgivable)… the expectation is you should have some real professional success by then if you’re an alpha/catch. Don’t bother approaching 8’s and 9’s if you’re 35 living in a terraced house.

    PUAs will use the ONE outlier like a serial killer that had female admirers as an example of ‘attraction being about dominant behaviour’….but that’s definitely not the trend in society. Most criminals have no attractive women in their life (‘don’t drop the soap’). If you think a 22 year old girl in university will choose a criminal over a successful banker because he’s ‘more alpha’ you are delusional or she has a mental illness. Doesn’t ever happen in reality.

    Like

    1. You make some good points man. But seems like you’re exclusively describing gold diggers…money hungry whores. Am I correct? Whatever happened to being attracted to a guy for who he is rather than his money? Once you lead with money, you ALWAYS have to lead with money…

      Like

      1. Disney and films condition men from a young age to feel that women don’t want money and prefer the charming caring, average guy (titanic, Aladdin)..these are very powerful propaganda tools which are designed to appeal to *most men* in order to make more money. If the film told the truth (she goes for the rich prince) nobody would watch it.
        They are not ‘goldiggers’ they are women who are designed to mate with the best social option to provide succesful/healthy offspring. The women you believe aren’t goldiggers; are just women who don’t have access to rich men, because they aren’t attractive enough – so they settle for looks, popularity, game etc. But the 8’s, 9’s etc fight and compete hand over fist to be seen at yatch parties, upscale clubs, expensive vacations etc because they have a shot at landing a baller

        Like

    2. So if we were to strip away that prince charming’s money and status from him, the girls would bounce I’d assume?

      Not sure if I’d wanna be with a chick who I know sees dollar signs when I’m banging her. For all I know, she’ll jump on the next richer dudes schlong anytime, perhaps after I’ve impregnated her…

      Jokes aside though, one does wonder why all these prince’s and royalty who come to the west pay hookers and escorts for a good time…when, as you say, pussy should be falling on their laps, no?

      Interesting discussion nonetheless. I think power and status trumps all else. Put Drake (not a fan btw) in a room with all your playboy friends…and watch your girls’ body language towards him.

      Again, I’m not bashing, I’m offering perspectives so we all can navigate this

      I do find daygame perhaps less efficient than other methods…when travelling though, it can be a win win

      Regards

      Cheers

      Like

      1. Lol girls want Drake cause he’s rich dude. Money = status. Why do you think PUA’s only ever score with girls from Eastern Europe? (Because those women perceive their Britishness = higher income)…
        Look there are lots of handsome men in a girls DM’s and life, and lots of guys with confidence/interesting personality traits/game. what do you think seperates them objectively? It’s financial class. All the middle class guys are a replaceable blur to her. Girls meet so few upper class/rich men that also meet her other thresholds…so these guys are seen as the rarity…
        Some of the biggest girls on Instagram with the most followers are getting vile things done to them by rich men in Saudi Arabia and Dubai (you can Google about it)..,meanwhile the other 1 million men don’t even get a reply

        Like

  10. Girls in general would rather have men believe they prefer ‘looks’ or even ‘status’ or ‘game’ because it sounds more honourable than money.

    Like

    1. I hear you about these IG models being flown over to the middle East and getting pooped on and beastialitied for 100 grand over a weekend. Heck I used to work in Chelsea and we used to get escorts come in

      Dunno about the money game though…that kinda relationship seems mad transactional.

      One things for sure…women never date down. A girl who dates athletes and celebs on the regular will have little to no time for the average Joe unless he bought some sort of value.

      Alot of these girls get *ran* through in their 20s by the big ballers. And then they end up having mental and commitment issues while looking for a beta provider.

      Stay woke fellas…and play the game

      Stay woke fellas

      Like

  11. The dating life of a hot girl (8s+):
    -Good looking lower/middle class men flatter her ego. She’ll go on dates, follow them online, match them, give out her number, dance etc but rarely sleep with them (except in occasional circumstances)

    -Rich men, with acceptable enough looks and height clap her cheeks

    If she’s a 7 or below, it’s reversed

    Like

  12. with tinder and Instagram women have played one of the greatest reverse unos on men ever…by confusing men to the point that most men think their ‘pics’ and hobbies are whats gonna get them laid, and money is completely under the radar as the main motive behind women’s choices … when 15 years ago it was common knowledge

    Like

  13. Personally I prefer to face reality rather than to cling to something that PUA marketing has promised.
    From other daygamers I know I can confirm these stats. Even the guys that are good looking and muscular have about 6 lays a year. Most of them start dating these girls for a couple of months. And most of these girls aren’t even 6’s.
    I do think that daygame is the best way for me and 12 6’s a year would be perfectly fine. I’ll still approach the 7’s and above whenever I can even when it is unlikely to go well.
    It is what it is, but that’s no excuse not to work hard. I’ll continue to work on myself and hopefully it will pay in the future.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s