This leads on from yesterday’s bulletin on Jordan Peterson. One of the biggest revelations I’ve had from consuming his material is finding out about how conscientiousness links to disgust. Now I can’t stop seeing it everywhere I look. There’s the classic kind of disgust, the kind you feel for something unhygienic. But there’s another kind … Continue reading 9/30: Disgust →

To confirm: I like him. I think it was natural that I would get on-board with his message considering that I’ve read about Jung, archetypes, and the monomyth before even hearing about him. I’m currently working my way through his podcasts and also through his lecture series, albeit at a slower pace. I’ve not read … Continue reading 8/30: My Thoughts on Jordan Peterson →

This is actually something I’ve read very little about. I’ve seen name-PUAs screenshots and so have observed their patterns of response, and I remember Tom Torero’s video on texting (the Dynamo one) where he says take a third longer to reply. But still, very little. There might be a reason to that: the advice is … Continue reading 7/30: Texting Response Times →

I went on an i-date on Saturday at the end of the day: 21 years old, grew up in Madagascar but then moved to Paris when she was 18 to study. Gwenn had decided to book a flight to London for the bank holiday weekend (Whit Monday, I believe, in France). She booked the tickets … Continue reading 6/30: A Recent I-Date →

This is something I’ve been thinking about for a while, and it’s the use of disclaimers in a lot of content, especially the content aimed at beginners. I don’t mean this as a finger pointing exercise, but I notice it the most in Tom Torero’s material. Now, I understand why he has to say things … Continue reading 5/30: Daygame Disclaimers →

And now for something completely different. One thing I’ve been forgetting to do recently is qualify in set. It’s such a key element but for a while it completely slipped my mind. So I set myself a rule, I always try to find out three pieces of information in-set, and qualify on all of them. … Continue reading 4/30: Qualification →

This analysis wouldn’t be complete without me talking about myself. Perhaps the question is: am I the one to have gone full r? Maybe my biology has shifted now so that I instinctively pick out the r traits in girls. Perhaps they were always there but they just didn’t have value for me, so I … Continue reading 3/30: London’s Gone Full r (3) →

Today I want to explore the implications of this from a dating perspective. I think that’s where more of the variation comes from, considering the Daygame itself is more like a string of set pieces. On a date, you have to show your real self, and if she finds out that you’re not the real … Continue reading 2/30: London’s Gone Full r (2) →

Mazz and I were standing near to Leicester Square station yesterday. An idea that I’d been nurturing bubbled up in my mind and emerged from that murky swamp. “You know,” I said, looking around, “I think 2018 is the year that London’s gone full r.” “How so?” “It seems that every girl I see now … Continue reading 1/30: London’s Gone Full r →

I’ll be releasing a short post every day for the next 30 days. I like the idea of waking up to a kind of Daygame bulletin which you can read over your morning coffee; the posts themselves will all be scheduled for 07:00am GMT release. Most of these posts will start with a sentence, or … Continue reading 0/30: Daygame Bulletin Series →